The Impact of Strategy, Business, and Information Technology Variables of Industrial Companies on Enterprise Architecture Design
Abstract
Architecture, a word derived from Greek, means the fundamental structure. Many process professionals believe that this term is synonymous with "business architecture." However, business process theorists usually emphasize the key role of process in defining the overall objectives of an organization. In fact, most process specialists view systems and organizations as a large process that converts inputs into outputs. They usually divide an organization into one or more value chains, and the value chain into several large business processes. This division continues through several stages until it reaches organizational activities and tasks. After creating key outputs and value chains, they proceed to define stakeholders, value propositions, Key Performance Indicators (KPI1), process management plans, and all the tools and methods that managers need to achieve optimal organizational performance. It is assumed that information technology leverages its capacity to support the organization's business process architecture. Strategies within an organization and its accompanying business structure, along with the integration of these two aspects with information technology, play a key and fundamental role in shaping a cohesive enterprise architecture. Architecture, a word derived from Greek, means the fundamental structure. Many process professionals believe that this term is synonymous with "business architecture." However, business process theorists usually emphasize the key role of process in defining the overall objectives of an organization. In fact, most process specialists view systems and organizations as a large process that converts inputs into outputs. They usually divide an organization into one or more value chains, and the value chain into several large business processes. This division continues through several stages until it reaches organizational activities and tasks. After creating key outputs and value chains, they proceed to define stakeholders, value propositions, Key Performance Indicators (KPI1), process management plans, and all the tools and methods that managers need to achieve optimal organizational performance. It is assumed that information technology leverages its capacity to support the organization's business process architecture. Strategies within an organization and its accompanying business structure, along with the integration of these two aspects with information technology, play a key and fundamental role in shaping a cohesive enterprise architecture. Architecture, a word derived from Greek, means the fundamental structure. Many process professionals believe that this term is synonymous with "business architecture." However, business process theorists usually emphasize the key role of process in defining the overall objectives of an organization. In fact, most process specialists view systems and organizations as a large process that converts inputs into outputs. They usually divide an organization into one or more value chains, and the value chain into several large business processes. This division continues through several stages until it reaches organizational activities and tasks. After creating key outputs and value chains, they proceed to define stakeholders, value propositions, Key Performance Indicators (KPI1), process management plans, and all the tools and methods that managers need to achieve optimal organizational performance. It is assumed that information technology leverages its capacity to support the organization's business process architecture. Strategies within an organization and its accompanying business structure, along with the integration of these two aspects with information technology, play a key and fundamental role in shaping a cohesive enterprise architecture.
Keywords:
Strategy, Business, Information technology, Key performance indicators, Enterprise architectureReferences
- [1] Roelens, B., Steenacker, W., & Poels, G. (2019). Realizing strategic fit within the business architecture: The design of a process-goal alignment modeling and analysis technique. Software & systems modeling, 18(1), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0574-5%0A%0A
- [2] Kitsios, F., & Kamariotou, M. (2019). Business strategy modelling based on enterprise architecture: A state of the art review. Business process management journal, 25(4), 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0122
- [3] Nahid, M., Amirreza, M., & Akbar, J. A. (2007). Architecture of electronic business models in e-commerce. National e-commerce conference.. SID. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/809954/fa
- [4] Grünig, R., & Kühn, R. (2006). Process-based strategic planning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36608-3_8%0A%0A
- [5] Steiner, G. A. (2010). Strategic planning. Simon and schuster. https://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=EXoPC22vb4oC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=+All+documents+obtained+from+the+above+process+are+called+strategic+planning.
- [6] Mahmoudi, J., Mousakhani, M., & Biriaei, H. S. (2010). Proposing a framework for assessing enterprise architecture maturity. Journal of information technology management, 1(3), 107-120. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/140393/fa
- [7] Rezaei, R., Shams Aliei, F., & Shams, Z. (2008). Providing a method for developing an enterprise architecture plan. Annual national conference of the iranian computer associationconference. SID. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/817324/fa
- [8] Ramadan Qomi, M. (2016). Facing the future challenges of enterprise architecture. International conference on research in science and technologyconference. SID. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/857834/fa
- [9] Jafari, S. M. B., Jandaghi, G., & Mohammadi Dorbash, Z. (2017). Investigating the impact of implementation components of business process reengineering projects on the success of these projects. Productivity management (beyond management), 10(39), 67-90. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/181971/fa
- [10] Khashman, A. M. (2019). The effect of business process re-engineering on organizational performance: The mediating role of information and communications technology. International journal of business and management, 14(9), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n9p132
- [11] Purwanto, A., & Sudargini, Y. (2021). Partial least squares structural squation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis for social and management research: A literature review. Journal of industrial engineering & management research, 2(4), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v2i4.168
- [12] Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Khan, M., Ali, W., & Shad, F. (2020). Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step-by-step procedure for non-experts. Business strategy and the environment, 29(8), 3086–3103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2559
- [13] Nkomo, A., & Marnewick, C. (2021). Improving the success rate of business process re-engineering projects: A business process re-engineering framework. South african journal of information management, 23(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1259
- [14] Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2022). Integrated simulation-optimization modeling framework of resilient design and planning of supply chain networks. IFAC-papersonline, 55(10), 2713–2718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.121