Effect of Performance Corporate Governance Mechanisms to Change the CEO in Companies

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48314/apem.v1i1.28

Abstract

According to the agency theory and the separation of ownership from management, including the most important measures of a company is management changes. On the other hand the cause of change the executive’s managers because their effectiveness should be a special place in accounting research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance impact and mechanisms of corporate governance on likely to change the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). To this end, 65 companies from the population, the information required for the 9-year period of the study (2008-2017) available in case they were selected. According to previous research, a measure of Return On Equity (ROE) and criteria for evaluating the performance of an entity, majority ownership, independence of board members, CEO positioning and public and private property for corporate governance was considered. To test the hypotheses, methods, and logistic regression with Eviews software were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results show that the variables of institutional ownership and independence of board members and the CEO have a negative impact on the relationship between performance, but the majority ownership has a positive effect causing the change of CEO is more sensitive to performance. The variable of director representing the majority shareholder in the company which is the majority shareholder representative, managing director has a significant negative relationship between performance and the CEO. The type of ownership (Private or government) has a significant negative impact on the relationship between performance and the CEO and the negative effects of private ownership is more than public ownership.

Keywords:

Corporate governance mechanisms, Managing director, Performance, State ownership, Private property

References

  1. [1] Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. The review of financial studies, 18(4), 1403–1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi030
  2. [2] Kato, T., & Long, C. (2006). CEO turnover, firm performance, and enterprise reform in China: Evidence from new micro data. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.877893
  3. [3] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  4. [4] El Diri, M., Lambrinoudakis, C., & Alhadab, M. (2020). Corporate governance and earnings management in concentrated markets. Journal of Business Research, 108, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.013
  5. [5] Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
  6. [6] Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(4), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.05.005
  7. [7] Fung, S., & Tsai, S. C. (2012). Institutional ownership and corporate investment performance. Canadian Journal of administrative sciences, 29(4), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1232
  8. [8] Shleifer, Sh.,& Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy, 94(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385
  9. [9] Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(96)00013-2
  10. [10] Jaiswall, S. S. K., & Bhattacharyya, A. K. (2016). Corporate governance and CEO compensation in Indian firms. Journal of contemporary accounting & economics, 12(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.06.001
  11. [11] Gao, H., Harford, J., & Li, K. (2017). CEO turnover–performance sensitivity in private firms. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 52(2), 583–611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000126
  12. [12] Diantai Deilami, Z., Moradzade Fard, M., & Mazaheri, A. (2013). The effect of chief executive officer tenure on firms' value, agency costs, and information risk. Empirical research in accounting, 3(3), 21-39. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2013.587
  13. [13] Moradi, M., & Hosseini, S. E. (2013). Examining the relationship between simultaneous change in senior management and earnings management: The final year of senior managers’ presence. Quarterly financial accounting (QFAJIR), 4(16), 40-60. (In Persian). http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-930-fa.html
  14. [14] Julizaerma, M. K., & Sori, Z. M. (2012). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance of Malaysian public-listed companies. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 65, 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.374
  15. [15] Moradi, M., & Rostami, A. The relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance after initial public offerings: Evidence from companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Journal of Monetary and Financial Economics, 19(4), 1-23. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/pm.v19i4.29312
  16. [16] Asadi, Gh., & Manti Monjagh Tapeh, V. (2011). Effect of changes in management to manage earnings. Journal financial management perspective, 1(1), 97-114. (In Persian). https://jfmp.sbu.ac.ir/article_94222.html?lang=fa
  17. [17] Asadi, Gh., & Manti Monjagh Tapeh, V. (2011). The effect of management changes announced on market reaction. Journal of Accounting, 27, 19-16. (In Persian). https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/883789/
  18. [18] Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
  19. [19] Olga, B., Bogdana, G., & Aleksandr, M. (2009). Firm performance and managerial turnover: The case of Ukraine. EERC research network, Russia and CIS. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:eer:wpalle:09/04e
  20. [20] Jahankhani, A., & Amini, S. (2008). The effect of management change on stock prices. Journal of Securities Exchange, 1(2), 117-146. (In Persian). https://journal.seo.ir/article_10841.html
  21. [21] Sikavica, K. (2008). Ownership structure, firm performance, and CEO turnover: The case of Switzerland. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2019479
  22. [22] Kaplan, S. N., & Minton, B. A. (2012). How has CEO turnover changed? International review of finance, 12(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2443.2011.01135.x
  23. [23] Brunninge, O., Nordqvist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small business economics, 29(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9021-2
  24. [24] Firth, M., Fung, P., & Rui, O. (2007). How ownership and corporate governance influence chief executive pay in China’s listed firms. Journal of Business Research, 60(11), 776–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.014
  25. [25] Nguyen, B. (2011). Ownership structure and board characteristics as determinants of CEO turnover in French-listed companies. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1456851
  26. [26] Kato, T., & Long, Ch. (2005). CEO turnover, firm performance, and corporate governance in Chinese listed firms. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.687350
  27. [27] Moghadam, A. K., & Kazempour, S. (2012). The effect of private ownership on economic value added (EVA) and return on assets (ROA) in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and auditing research, 4(14), 66-81. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iaar.2012.104686
  28. [28] Saeedi, A., & Shiriqahi, A. (2012). Ownership structure and corporate performance (Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange). Stock exchange, 3(18), 153–172. (In Persian). https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/2013382

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Annals of Process Engineering and Management

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Effect of Performance Corporate Governance Mechanisms to Change the CEO in Companies. (2024). Annals of Process Engineering and Management, 1(1), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.48314/apem.v1i1.28

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.